A question for the "regulars", at bloghi
If "yall" would be intrested, I have a proposal. Due to the fact that some people do not allow any comments on their "spot"....If "yall" would like, I offer to cut and paste, "with credit given to the source of course, and "re-post" with the exception of a fully open comment section...on an appropriately titled "new Blog".......your thoughts???????...riff
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically
Comment by NOT the skank— 2009/02/03 @ 05:41 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/03 @ 05:44 AM — (Reply)
Comment by mos— 2009/02/03 @ 07:41 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/02/03 @ 08:13 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Dugg— 2009/02/03 @ 08:20 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/03 @ 09:19 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/03 @ 09:24 AM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/02/03 @ 10:00 AM — (Reply)
so pasting her entire article here will mean people will come here to read it vice her site because there will be some interaction and discussion
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/02/03 @ 10:07 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Dugg— 2009/02/03 @ 10:11 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/03 @ 12:48 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/02/03 @ 01:31 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/03 @ 02:18 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dugg— 2009/02/03 @ 03:11 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/03 @ 05:28 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dugg— 2009/02/03 @ 06:25 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/03 @ 06:32 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dugg— 2009/02/03 @ 06:33 PM — (Reply)
ps to Jimbo and Aza: no offense guys but based on the "spelled" I "doubt" you guys are behind the "skank" blog.
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/03 @ 06:38 PM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/03 @ 07:13 PM — (Reply)
Comment by NOT the skank— 2009/02/03 @ 08:08 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dugg— 2009/02/03 @ 08:32 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/02/03 @ 08:40 PM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/02/03 @ 10:30 PM — (Reply)